Organization’s performance appraisal system (Module 4 update) (Hệ thống đánh giá hiệu suất nhân viên) - EBS - Dr.Ahmed Radwan

UN
Uni24h
0 téléchargements
45
0

Contenu du document

Page 1

ORGANIZATIONALORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOURBEHAVIOUR Module FourModule Four Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 2

 An organization’s performance appraisal system is defined as a process which generates valid information about employee work effectiveness for the purpose of making informed human resource decisions. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 3

 Employees must understand the behavioural requirements of the job.  Employees need to know where they stand with the organization in terms of their performance.  Employees’ work must be evaluated for its contributions to organizational goals. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 4

 Valid information about performance levels of the employees should be used to make decisions about salary increases, promotion, bonuses and training needs.  Employees should have a clear understanding of what the organization expects from them in terms of performance. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 5

 Managers can use the performance appraisal system as a motivational tool.  An effective appraisal system creates many opportunities for managers to interact with their subordinates about unit performance standards, organizational goals and personal job interests. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 7

Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal  The process of assessment must produceThe process of assessment must produce results which areresults which are fairfair,, timelytimely andand accurateaccurate  Deficiency:Deficiency: represents actual performance that isrepresents actual performance that is overlookedoverlooked because thebecause the evaluator ignores itevaluator ignores it or theor the appraisal system fails to capture it.appraisal system fails to capture it. • An example : the appraisal system that tracks the frequencyAn example : the appraisal system that tracks the frequency of calls handled by representatives& fails to capture theof calls handled by representatives& fails to capture the quality of the service & the customer satisfaction.quality of the service & the customer satisfaction. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 8

Unreliability problems Deficiency problem Situational factors .1 Performance overlooked affecting the evaluator, by the evaluator such as mood or timing of the evaluation Disagreement .2 True between evaluators or Assessment Unreliability Deficiency Invalidity inconsistent of methods ( Valid + Temporary personal .3 Reliable) factors, such as fatigue or ill health of the .person being evaluated Validity problem Actual Measured Poorly defined task Performance Performance performance Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 9

Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal • UnreliabilityUnreliability:: It stems from numerous origins, many of which areIt stems from numerous origins, many of which are in thein the evaluator (s)evaluator (s)  Validity:Validity: is theis the quality of the measuring componentsquality of the measuring components in ain a performance appraisal system i.e. do the componentsperformance appraisal system i.e. do the components measure what they are supposed to measure?measure what they are supposed to measure?  Validity is the proven relationship that exists betweenValidity is the proven relationship that exists between a selection device and some relevant job criteriona selection device and some relevant job criterion Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 10

Performance AppraisalPerformance Appraisal Consistency:Consistency: i.e. two or more ways of gathering performancei.e. two or more ways of gathering performance produce results whichproduce results which agreeagree StabilityStability::  It means that performance measuring items shouldIt means that performance measuring items should yield the same score at variousyield the same score at various evaluation periodsevaluation periods ifif the performance characteristic has not changedthe performance characteristic has not changed  It is the property of dependability of resultsIt is the property of dependability of results over timeover time.. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 11

1.Personal bias 2.Halo effect 3.Recency error 4.Central tendency error 5.Strictness or leniency errors 6.Similarity error 7.Forcing the rating to match other criteria Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 12

1. Personal bias: A stereotype or bias which influence a superior’s rating upward or downward. 2. Halo effect: Rating an employee on one trait based on other traits. A general impression of an employee based on a single characteristic. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 13

Recency Error:Recency Error: - The emphasis of recent performance examplesThe emphasis of recent performance examples inin making performance assessmentsmaking performance assessments Central Tendency ErrorCentral Tendency Error:: - Assigning average ratings to all employeesAssigning average ratings to all employees which causes little variation among ratings.which causes little variation among ratings. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 14

Similarity Error: • The supervisor has a performance quality in himself which he looks for in subordinates. Forcing the rating to match other criteria: • Deciding on an overall rating first then going back to adjust ratings on the individual dimensions to justify the overall rating. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 15

Edwin Locke, described the relationship between goals and work performance . Goals are defined as those end states which reduce the intensity of needs and motives Clearly specific, difficult goals result in greater performance than general easy goals. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 16

Goal Setting SystemsGoal Setting Systems  Increase work motivation andIncrease work motivation and performanceperformance  Reduce the stressReduce the stress of conflicting or confusingof conflicting or confusing expectationsexpectations  Improve the accuracy and validityImprove the accuracy and validity of performanceof performance evaluation .evaluation . Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 18

Performance FeedbackPerformance Feedback  Feedback is a highly importantFeedback is a highly important element forelement for sustaining the focus of effort towards certain goal.sustaining the focus of effort towards certain goal.  Organisations must incorporateOrganisations must incorporate well timedwell timed formalformal andand informalinformal feedbackfeedback that keeps managersthat keeps managers and employees appraised of their progress .and employees appraised of their progress .  Feedback is anFeedback is an important intrinsic rewardimportant intrinsic reward forfor employees.employees. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 19

 MBO is an application of goal-setting theory.  Peter Drucker. advocates MBO as a process which develops self-control in managers by controlling organizational and individual outcomes.  The mutual acceptance of goal increases the probability that the goal will be achieved and job satisfaction, performance and motivation will occur Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Page 20

1)Increase work motivation and employee job performance. 2)Reduce the stress of conflicting or confusing work expectations for employees. 3)Improve the accuracy and validity of performance evaluation work in the organization. Dr.Ahmed RadwanDr.Ahmed Radwan

Affichage des 20 premières pages. Téléchargez le document pour le voir en entier.

Commentaires (0)

Se connecter pour rejoindre la discussion

Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier !