Page 5
Components in a Hadoop MR Workflow Next few slides are from: http://www.slideshare.net/hadoop/practical-problem-solving-with-apache-hadoop-pig
Génération de l'aperçu...
Components in a Hadoop MR Workflow Next few slides are from: http://www.slideshare.net/hadoop/practical-problem-solving-with-apache-hadoop-pig
Quick Overview of Other Topics (Will Revisit Them Later in the Course) • Dealing with failures • Hadoop Distributed FileSystem (HDFS) • Optimizing a MapReduce job
Dealing with Failures and Slow Tasks • What to do when a task fails? – Try again (retries possible because of idempotence) – Try again somewhere else – Report failure • What about slow tasks: stragglers – Run another version of the same task in parallel. Take results from the one that finishes first – What are the pros and cons of this approach? Fault tolerance is of high priority in the MapReduce framework
Lifecycle of a MapReduce Job Time Input Map Map Reduce Reduce Splits Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 1 Wave 2 How are the number of splits, number of map and reduce tasks, memory allocation to tasks, etc., determined?
Tuning Hadoop Job Conf. Parameters • Do their settings impact performance? • What are ways to set these parameters? – Defaults -- are they good enough? – Best practices -- the best setting can depend on data, job, and cluster properties – Automatic setting
Experimental Setting • Hadoop cluster on 1 master + 16 workers • Each node: – 2GHz AMD processor, 1.8GB RAM, 30GB local disk – Relatively ill-provisioned! – Xen VM running Debian Linux – Max 4 concurrent maps & 2 reduces • Maximum map wave size = 16x4 = 64 • Maximum reduce wave size = 16x2 = 32 • Not all users can run large Hadoop clusters: – Can Hadoop be made competitive in the 10-25 node, multi GB to TB data size range?
Affichage des 20 premières pages. Téléchargez le document pour le voir en entier.
Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier !
Commentaires (0)
Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier !