Trang 1
Module 11ModuleModuleModule 111111 Costs for Decision Making Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 1
Đang tạo bản xem trước...
Module 11ModuleModuleModule 111111 Costs for Decision Making Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 1
Learning Objectives By the end of this module you should understand: 1. The distinction between full and variable costing 2. The impact on reported profit between the two cost systems 3. The concept of relevant cost for special decisions 4. The analytical framework surrounding relevant costs 5. The application of relevant costs to: − the make or buy decision − opportunity cost − sunk cost − the special sales order − further processing Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 2
Agenda 11.1 Introduction 11.2 The Dilemma of the Denominator 11.3 Managerial Implications of Absorption versus Variable Costing 11.4 Cost Information for Management Decisions 11.5 Routine and Non-Routine Decisions 11.6 Developing an Analytical Framework 11.7 Finding the Relevant Costs 1111..88 The Pitfalls of Full CostingThe Pitfalls of Full Costing 11.9 Opportunity Costs 11.10 Department versus Company 11.11 Sunk Costs 11.12 Management Decisions in Action 11.13 Closing Down a Unit 11.14 The Special Sales Order 11.15 Should we Process Further? Review Questions Case Studies Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 3
In module 9, we’ve covered the behavior of different types of cost; where costs are broken down into variable and fixed costs Variable Costs Fixed Costs Costs that change in magnitude with Costs that do NOT change as production production or sales levels or sales move up or down provide: Useful ManagerialUseful ManagerialUseful ManagerialUseful Managerial InformationInformation e.g. break-even points & the impact on profit of changing sales mixes Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 4
Module 10 described various procedures for spreading those costs using plantwide and departmental overhead rates Plantwide RatesPlantwide Rates DepartmentalDepartmental RatesRates based on: Predetermined Overhead Rate Budgeted overhead for accounting period Budgeted Production Units expressed in:expressed in: either or Units producedUnits produced AppropriateAppropriate activity basesactivity bases To determine the cost per unit of production or service This calculation is required before actual production and sales take place so that management can make decisions on output levels and prices Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 5
This module explores the implications of combining the desirable features of both of these topics 1 Calculating the full cost per unitCalculating the full cost per unit Managerial decisions which lie outsideManagerial decisions which lie outside 2 normal routine proceduresnormal routine procedures So that:So that: FundamentalFundamental management choicesmanagement choices can be made oncan be made on appropriate costingappropriate costing systemsystem Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 6
Agenda 11.1 Introduction 11.2 The Dilemma of the Denominator 11.3 Managerial Implications of Absorption versus Variable Costing 11.4 Cost Information for Management Decisions 11.5 Routine and Non-Routine Decisions 11.6 Developing an Analytical Framework 11.7 Finding the Relevant Costs 1111..88 The Pitfalls of Full CostingThe Pitfalls of Full Costing 11.9 Opportunity Costs 11.10 Department versus Company 11.11 Sunk Costs 11.12 Management Decisions in Action 11.13 Closing Down a Unit 11.14 The Special Sales Order 11.15 Should we Process Further? Review Questions Case Studies Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 7
In the DVD cabinet example, we’ve allocated the share of manufacturing overhead and that of non-manufacturing overhead through the predetermined rate Predetermined Budgeted overhead for accounting period Overhead Allocation = Rate Budgeted Production Units Such a calculation must be made in advance of production so that the desired selling price can be calculated Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 8
The determination of both numerator and denominator is fraught with problems, but that of the denominator is usually more unpredictable Numerator Denominator Sometimes overheads fluctuate as their The denominator is not so readily market prices may vary during the predictable accounting period But if: Business may plan to produce and sell 1,000 units per year based on experience, The estimation process has been handled a figure determined by market research carefullycarefully exercises and production capacityexercises and production capacity then but The variations at the end of the period A sudden upsurge in demand can cause are usually small the actual number produced and sold to go to 1,200 units and/or An unforeseen shortage in raw materials could reduce production to 800 units The denominator would cause the predetermined allocation rate to be either too low or too high Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 9
1) Example showing that when actual production equals planned production, no denominator volume variances will occur Example A business manufacturing designer fountain pens planned to produce and sell 10,000 in 20x2. Costs of manufacture per pen were: Here the allocation of fixed production overheads was based on the budgeted total expenditure and the budgeted volume of output of pens for 20x2, namely 10,000. Each pen sells for €100 yielding a gross profit of €40 per pen from which selling, administrative and financial costs would be deducted. Assume these costs to amount to €200,000. Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 10
Example (Continued) If in 20x2 everything went according to plan the business would produce a P/L account like this: This form of accounting is called full or absorption cost accounting because each unit is asked to absorb its share of fixed production overhead, a reasonable requirement Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 11
Example (Continued) However, let us assume that management’s freedom of pricing was severely restricted because of competitive forces in the designer fountain pen market; in addition because of uncertainty of demand the business produced only what was required and therefore made no attempt to allocate fixed production overhead to each product. If, during 20x2, the company achieved exactly the same outcome, that is, producing and selling 10,000 pens with the same costs the profit and loss account would look like this: This form of accounting is called variable or direct costing because it accounts for fixed costs in a lump sum Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 12
Note that contribution is a term used to show the sales revenue less variable (marginal) costs incurred in generating this revenue Contribution Margin Sales Revenue - Variable (marginal) costs incurred Contribution Margin Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 13
We conclude that the net profit under both methods is identical; that’s because actual production equals planned production and sales equals production If: Actual production equals planned production Sales equals production Net profit under both methods is identical But we know that actual production hardly ever matches exactly planned production, and it is rare to find a business where all production is sold by the end of the accounting period Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 14
2) Example that shows that bottom-line profit difference arises when sales is not equal to actual production Example Assume that the absorption costing method is applied to the fountain pen business described above. Planned production was 10,000 but actual production was 11,000 due to a desire to keep operatives busy throughout the year. The excess will be sold next year. Throughout the year each pen will be allocated €10 fixed production costs as before but in the light of actual production level achieved this should have been: Each unit has over-absorbed €0.91, a total of €10,000 (11 000 × €0.91) for the year Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 15
Absorption method produces higher net profit in P/L account, though it’s been adjusted for the denominator volume variance at the end of the year This over-absorbed sum (€10,000 ) has been caused by the wrong denominator volume being selected and must be corrected at the end of the year, otherwise the production would be seen to be absorbing more costs than had been incurred. Note that the denominator volume variance helps to reduce production costs in the P/L account which otherwise would be overstated by the over-absorption of fixed production costs Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 16
We set out the two methods (absorption and variable costing) side by side The variable (or direct) costing profit and loss would be identical to the one already produced. We set out the two methods side by side Why the difference of €10,000? 1,000 pens have been produced which have not been sold; these pens have been placed in inventory, each one valued, under absorption costing, at €60, i.e. €60,000. Under variable costing the same 1,000 pens are valued at €50 each, i.e. €50,000. Therefore under absorption costing an extra €10,000 of cost has been held back in inventory for release in the next period Note that the difference in bottom-line profit has nothing to do with the denominator volume variance Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 17
On the other hand the absorption method produces a different figure (less) when the actual production is less than the planned one We move our example one year on and keep all facts and figures the same except that production is reduced to 9,000 pens even though the estimate at the beginning of the year was again 10,000. For 20x3 the two profit and loss accounts would be: Again there is a difference of €10,000 in bottom-line profit and again a denominator volume variance of €10,000. And again the two figures are unrelated Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 18
This difference in profit is due to the value of inventory needed to satisfy 20x3’s sales Denominator Volume Variance Difference in Profits Caused by: Caused by: The fact that the 9,000 pens Production was 9,000; sales were 10,000; manufactured only absorbed €90,000 therefore 1,000 pens were taken from fixed production expenses whilefixed production expenses while €€100100,,000000 inventory. Under absorption costing theseinventory. Under absorption costing these was incurred in 20x3 units emerge from inventory at €60 instead of €50 under variable costing The shortfall must be written off at the Profits therefore fall by 1000 × €10 (the end of the year difference in inventory value per pen which itself is the fixed production costs per pen) Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 19
Conclusion A denominator volume variance arises: When actual production ≠ planned production Bottom-line profit difference arises: When sales ≠ actual production Omar ElKheshen – omar@arabacademy.com 20
Hiển thị 20 trang đầu. Tải tài liệu để xem đầy đủ.
Chưa có bình luận nào. Hãy là người đầu tiên!
Bình luận (0)
Chưa có bình luận nào. Hãy là người đầu tiên!